The Real Founder of Islam? It Wasn’t Muhammad.
Islam claims divine origin through Muhammad in 7th-century Arabia — a prophet sent with the Qur’an, establishing Mecca as the holy center, and launching the final revelation to mankind.
But there’s a fatal problem:
None of that — not Muhammad, not the Qur’an, not Islam — can be confirmed by any independent historical source from his lifetime.
No documents.
No inscriptions.
No coins.
No eyewitness records.
Nothing.
Meanwhile, another figure does appear in the verified historical record — and he doesn’t just emerge from the shadows. He builds mosques, issues scripture, inscribes theology into stone, and mints the first Islamic coins.
That man is ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Marwān, caliph of the Umayyad dynasty.
📜 What the Historical Record Doesn’t Confirm
Let’s be precise: to be historically confirmed, a figure must be attested by contemporary, independent, and unambiguous sources.
By this standard, the following core elements of Islam fail:
-
Muhammad: No record of him during his lifetime in any non-Muslim source. No mention in inscriptions, coins, or external documents until decades later.
-
The Qur’an: No full manuscript reliably dated to the early 7th century. No mention of its existence in any external source before the late 7th century.
-
Mecca: Not cited in any pre-Islamic or early Islamic geographies. Absent from early trade maps. No inscriptions or monuments tied to it until much later.
-
Islam: No mention of it as a religion during the Rashidun period. Early Arab conquerors are referred to as Saracens, Hagarenes, or simply Arabs, with no reference to Islam or Muhammad.
The Rashidun Caliphs — Abu Bakr, ʿUmar, ʿUthman, and ʿAli — also go completely unmentioned in all non-Muslim records of the 7th century.
This is not a minor gap — it’s a black hole at the very foundation of Islamic origins.
🏛️ The Turning Point: ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Marwān (r. 685–705 CE)
Then, suddenly, Islam enters history — not through Muhammad, but through ʿAbd al-Malik, the fifth Umayyad caliph. Here’s what we can prove from hard evidence:
🪙 1. Coinage Reform (c. 692 CE)
He issued the first distinctly Islamic coins:
-
Inscribed with “Muḥammad is the Messenger of God”.
-
Replacing Christian symbols like the cross with Arabic script and Qur’anic phrases.
This is the first time Muhammad’s name appears in any datable material.
🕌 2. Dome of the Rock (Built 691–692 CE)
Constructed under ʿAbd al-Malik’s orders in Jerusalem:
-
Inscriptions include Qur’anic verses denouncing Christian beliefs (e.g. denying Jesus as the Son of God).
-
Repeated references to Muḥammad as God’s Messenger.
-
Uses Qur’anic language — but notably different from the canonical text in later manuscripts.
🧠 This is the earliest physical monument linking Qur’anic theology to a named historical figure.
📝 3. State Standardization
ʿAbd al-Malik:
-
Made Arabic the official language of administration.
-
Replaced Byzantine and Sasanian motifs with Islamic slogans and Qur’anic themes.
-
Began crafting an imperial religious identity centered on Muhammad and the Qur’an — for the first time.
All of this is archaeologically confirmed, not based on Islamic tradition.
🧠 So What Does This Tell Us?
There is no verifiable Islam before ʿAbd al-Malik.
No Muhammad.
No Qur’an.
No Mecca.
No Islam.
But from ʿAbd al-Malik onward, we get an explosion of evidence:
-
Coins with Islamic declarations.
-
Monumental inscriptions.
-
Administrative reforms aligning theology with imperial power.
The “Islamic identity” enters history not as a grassroots prophetic movement — but as a top-down state project.
🔨 The Logical Consequence
If:
-
There is no objective, external evidence for Muhammad, Mecca, or the Qur’an before ʿAbd al-Malik,
And:
-
ʿAbd al-Malik is the first historical figure to publicly invoke Muhammad and Qur’anic scripture,
Then:
The only Islam that can be proven to exist is the one ʿAbd al-Malik created.
The Islam of Muhammad? That’s a retrospective theological narrative — compiled 150 to 250 years later by state-sponsored scholars, long after the fact.
🧩 Final Verdict
The historical record doesn’t begin with a prophet in a cave.
It begins with a caliph in a palace — issuing coins, commissioning monuments, and weaponizing religion to consolidate power.
Islam, as a historical phenomenon, does not begin with Muhammad.
It begins with ʿAbd al-Malik.
That’s not speculation.
That’s what the evidence says.
No appeal to faith. No trust in tradition. Just facts.
No comments:
Post a Comment