Post 5: The Quran’s Contradictions on the Bible – Confirm It or Condemn It?

Introduction: A Crisis of Affirmation

Islam faces a monumental contradiction at its theological core. The Quran repeatedly affirms the previous scriptures—the Torah (Tawrat), Psalms (Zabur), and Gospel (Injeel)—as divine revelations sent by Allah. Yet it simultaneously rejects the content of those very scriptures as corrupt, altered, or false whenever they contradict Islamic teachings.

This double claim is not just confusing—it’s self-defeating. You cannot both confirm a document and deny its contents. That is a contradiction in logic, scripture, and theology.

Islam wants the legitimacy of the Bible without the content of the Bible.

This post will expose how the Quran's stance on the Bible undermines its own credibility, falsifies its core assertions, and collapses under the weight of logical analysis and manuscript evidence.

Section 1: What Does the Quran Say About the Bible?

🔹 Affirmation Verses:

The Quran makes multiple claims that the Torah and Gospel were revealed by Allah:

Surah 3:3 – “He has revealed to you the Book with truth, confirming what came before it, and He revealed the Torah and the Gospel.”
Surah 5:46 – “And We sent, following in their footsteps, Jesus... and We gave him the Gospel, in which was guidance and light... confirming the Torah.”
Surah 5:68 – “Say, O People of the Scripture, you are on nothing until you uphold the Torah, the Gospel, and what has been revealed to you from your Lord.”
Surah 10:94 – “So if you are in doubt, [O Muhammad], about that which We have revealed to you, then ask those who have been reading the Scripture before you...”

These verses clearly:

Affirm the divine origin of the Bible.
Refer to it as truth and light.
Instruct Jews and Christians to follow their own books.

Nowhere in these verses is there any suggestion that the books were corrupted.

So far, so good—until the contradictions begin.

Section 2: The Quran Rejects the Bible’s Content

While the Quran affirms the Bible’s authority, it simultaneously denies its teachings:

Jesus is not the Son of God (Surah 4:171, 5:72).
Jesus was not crucified (Surah 4:157).
There is no original sin or atonement (Surah 6:164, 53:38).
The Trinity is condemned (Surah 5:73).

These are not minor theological differences. They are complete rejections of the foundational doctrines of both Judaism and Christianity.

But those doctrines come directly from the texts the Quran claims were revealed by Allah.

So the Quran is faced with a dilemma:

Either the Bible is true and divinely preserved, and the Quran is false for contradicting it.
Or the Bible has been corrupted, and the Quran is false for affirming it.

There is no third option.

Section 3: The “Corruption” Claim – A Historical Fabrication

When confronted with these contradictions, Muslims often resort to the claim that the Bible has been tampered with.

This belief is not found in the Quran itself. Instead, it appears later in Islamic history, centuries after Muhammad.

The Quran criticizes some Jews for hiding or misrepresenting verses (Surah 2:75, 2:79), but never says the entire scriptures were changed.

Further, it commands:

Jews to judge by the Torah (Surah 5:43)
Christians to judge by the Gospel (Surah 5:47)

These commands make no sense if the texts were corrupted at the time.

And even if the Bible were changed, when exactly did this happen?

Before Muhammad? Then why does the Quran still affirm it?
After Muhammad? Then why do we have Bible manuscripts from hundreds of years earlier that match today’s versions?

The corruption theory is a post hoc rationalization—a theological Band-Aid to cover a fatal wound.

Section 4: Manuscript Evidence – The Bible Is Intact

The Quran accuses the Bible of being altered. History says otherwise.

🧾 The Torah:

Dead Sea Scrolls (200 BCE–70 CE): Contain every book of the Hebrew Bible except Esther.
95% of the Masoretic Text (used in modern Bibles) matches the Dead Sea Scrolls.

📜 The Gospels:

Codex Sinaiticus (~325 CE)
Codex Vaticanus (~325–350 CE)
Papyrus P52 (fragment of John’s Gospel dated ~125 CE)

These manuscripts match today’s Bibles with remarkable consistency. There is no record of any Islamic gospel or Torah that ever matched the Quran’s narrative.

If Allah revealed the Torah and Gospel, and if his word cannot be changed (Surah 6:115, 18:27), then the Quran must be false—because it contradicts the uncorrupted text.

Section 5: The Injeel – The Phantom Scripture

Muslims often claim that the Injeel was a “true Gospel” given to Jesus, now lost or replaced by the four Gospels.

But this presents multiple problems:

There is no historical evidence of a book called “Injeel” ever existing separately.
No first-century Christian, Roman, or Jewish text mentions it.
The Quran never quotes from the Injeel—only references it vaguely.
The four Gospels of the New Testament are the only records of Jesus' life and teachings.

If the Injeel existed and was lost, then Allah failed to preserve his own revelation, contradicting Surah 15:9 (“Indeed, We have sent down the Reminder, and indeed, We will be its guardian”).

The idea of a lost Gospel is an Islamic myth, invented to dodge the incompatibility between the Quran and historical Christianity.

Section 6: Logical Contradictions Within the Quran

Let’s break the problem down into formal logic.

Claim:

The Quran confirms the Torah and the Gospel as divine, preserved scriptures.

Premises:

The Quran says God’s word cannot be changed (Surah 6:115; 18:27).
The Torah and Gospel are said to be God’s word (Surah 3:3; 5:46).
Therefore, the Torah and Gospel cannot be corrupted.
The Torah and Gospel contradict the Quran on central doctrines.
Therefore, the Quran contradicts books it claims to confirm.

Conclusion:

The Quran contains a self-refuting contradiction.

It affirms texts it simultaneously must reject to maintain doctrinal consistency. This is not merely a problem—it is a fatal flaw in the Quran’s internal logic.

Section 7: Early Muslim Commentary Admits the Contradiction

Early Islamic scholars wrestled with this problem.

Al-Tabari (9th century): Admitted that Christians and Jews possessed the same scriptures, not corrupted ones.
Ibn Kathir: Differentiated between tahrif al-lafz (textual corruption) and tahrif al-ma'na (interpretational corruption), implicitly admitting the text survived but was misunderstood.

The shift to outright textual corruption came centuries after Muhammad—indicating it was a later apologetic development, not a revelation-based doctrine.

Section 8: Special Pleading and Theological Gaslighting

Islam's tactic is clear:

When the Bible agrees with the Quran: “See? It’s confirming Islam!”
When the Bible contradicts the Quran: “It must have been corrupted!”

This is a textbook case of the fallacy of special pleading—applying inconsistent standards to protect one’s beliefs.

It also amounts to theological gaslighting—insisting something is true while denying all external evidence and rewriting the rules when cornered.

If Islam were true, it wouldn’t need to play these games.

Section 9: Implications for the Quran’s Legitimacy

This contradiction isn’t peripheral—it’s central.

If the Quran misrepresents:

The nature of the Torah
The content of the Gospels
The doctrine of Jesus
The structure of salvation

Then it cannot be considered a confirmation of previous revelations.

It becomes a replacement, and therefore must stand on its own.

But Islam doesn't want that—because standing alone, the Quran lacks:

A messianic narrative
A coherent salvation theology
Historical connection to the ancient world
Doctrinal consistency

Without the Bible to legitimize it, the Quran is exposed as a theological orphan.

Conclusion: You Cannot Confirm and Contradict at the Same Time

The Quran makes a fatal mistake: it tries to claim the Bible’s authority while denying its content. This is an irreconcilable contradiction.

You cannot confirm a scripture and simultaneously contradict its core.

The Bible and the Quran are not different versions of the same message. They are mutually exclusive. And since the Bible’s content is:

Older
Better preserved
Historically verifiable

…it follows that the Quran’s contradiction of the Bible disqualifies its own claim to truth.

Disclaimer

This post critiques Islam as an ideology, doctrine, and historical system—not Muslims as individuals. Every human deserves respect; beliefs do not.

Refuting Islam

Wednesday, August 27, 2025