⚖ Reliance of the Traveller: Islam’s Hidden Legal Blueprint for Suppression, Violence, and Control
What they won’t quote in public is still binding in law.
π Introduction
Western audiences are told:
“Sharia is just prayer, charity, and fasting.”
“Only extremists believe in harsh punishments.”
“Islamic law isn’t even practiced anymore.”
But there’s a book that proves otherwise — a book Muslims rarely mention, and even fewer critics know in detail:
Umdat al-Salik (Arabic: ΨΉΩ Ψ―Ψ© Ψ§ΩΨ³Ψ§ΩΩ), known in English as Reliance of the Traveller.
This 14th-century Shafi’i manual of Islamic law is not fringe.
It is:
-
Approved by Al-Azhar University (the highest Sunni authority),
-
Used in Sharia courts across Muslim countries,
-
Still studied in Islamic seminaries and universities, including in the West.
And it openly legalizes:
-
Wife-beating
-
Apostate execution
-
Female genital mutilation
-
Lying in defense of Islam (taqiyya)
-
Killing critics of Muhammad
-
Second-class status for non-Muslims
This post exposes the real Sharia law — not the sanitized version sold to Western audiences.
π What Is Reliance of the Traveller?
-
Written by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 1368), a medieval Shafi’i jurist from Cairo.
-
Based entirely on early Islamic sources — Quran, Hadith, and rulings of the four Sunni imams.
-
The most widely used manual of Shafi’i jurisprudence (fiqh).
-
The 1991 English translation by Nuh Ha Mim Keller was officially certified by Al-Azhar University — granting it global Sunni legitimacy.
Certification Statement by Al-Azhar (from the publisher):
“We certify that this translation corresponds to the Arabic original and conforms to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni community.”
π It is not a "radical" document. It is standardized Sunni Islamic law, complete with legally binding rulings for personal, social, economic, political, and criminal life.
π§± Key Sections That Expose the Brutal Core of Sharia
☠️ Apostasy = Death (Section o8)
o8.1 – “When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.”
This ruling is not optional. It is considered a hadd punishment, meaning it is fixed by Allah and cannot be overturned by human will.
o8.4 – “There is no indemnity for killing an apostate (or any expiation), since it is killing someone who deserves to die.”
Expanded Detail:
-
o8.7 lists over 20 acts that automatically constitute apostasy, including:
-
Saying Islam is false.
-
Denying even one verse of the Quran.
-
Calling Muhammad immoral.
-
Rejecting the consensus of scholars.
-
π Reformers, critics, liberal Muslims, ex-Muslims, and secular thinkers all fall under this legal category.
π‘ Blasphemy = Death (Section o8.7 & o9.14)
o8.7(4) – “To revile Allah or His messenger... is apostasy.”
o9.14 – “It is obligatory to kill anyone who reviles the Prophet.”
This ruling is drawn from:
-
Bukhari 4:52:261 – “A man was brought who had reviled the Prophet, and Muhammad said: Who will kill this man for me?”
π Modern blasphemy killings — from Salman Rushdie to Asia Bibi — are fully sanctioned by this section.
⚔️ Jihad: Offensive Warfare Is Obligatory (Section o9)
o9.0 – “Jihad means to war against non-Muslims to establish the religion.”
o9.1 – Based on Quran 9:29:
“Fight those who do not believe in Allah… until they pay the jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued.”
o9.8 – “The caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians… until they become Muslim or pay the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya).”
Expanded Detail:
-
These are not defensive wars. They are offensive campaigns to spread Islam.
-
The goal is to bring all under Islamic rule — or subject them as dhimmis.
π The “inner struggle” myth is exposed as PR fiction. This section confirms jihad is primarily about warfare.
π§ Women: Inferior Legal Status (Sections m3, m10, m12, n4)
-
m3.7 – “Two women’s testimony equals that of one man” (from Quran 2:282).
-
m10.11 – A woman must seek permission to leave the house.
-
m12.4 – A wife cannot refuse sex unless menstruating, sick, or fasting.
Expanded Detail:
-
Women cannot lead prayer over men.
-
In marriage, women are seen as contracted sexual partners, with obligations of obedience.
π Islamic law recognizes no legal gender equality.
π Wife Beating Legalized (Section m10.12)
“If she does not obey him, he may hit her — but not in the face.”
This directly cites Quran 4:34, which permits beating as the third disciplinary step if admonishment and sexual refusal fail.
π Legal sanction for domestic abuse — embedded in Sharia.
π©Έ Female Genital Mutilation (Section e4.3)
“Circumcision is obligatory (for both men and women).”
Expanded Detail:
-
The term used for women in Arabic is khitan al-untha, referring to removal of part of the clitoris.
-
This ruling is drawn from Hadiths and upheld in many Shafi’i countries (e.g., Egypt, Malaysia, Indonesia).
π FGM is not cultural — it is codified in law.
πͺ Non-Muslims: Permanent Second-Class Status (Section o11)
o11.1–o11.11 – Dhimmis must:
-
Pay the jizya “while feeling themselves subdued.”
-
Not build new places of worship.
-
Not display religious symbols.
-
Not ride horses or bear arms.
-
Not publicly practice their religion.
-
Accept being ruled by Muslims in law and blood money.
π Religious freedom is outlawed. Non-Muslims are inferior by design.
π€₯ Lying for Islam (Taqiyya) Permitted (Section r8)
r8.2 – “It is permissible to lie if the goal is permissible… and no harm is caused.”
Examples of permissible goals:
-
Protecting Islam
-
Gaining trust of enemies
-
Preventing harm to Muslims
-
Advancing the faith diplomatically
π This ruling justifies deception in interfaith dialogue, politics, or war — where truth is secondary to Islamic interests.
π§ What This Means Today
-
This manual is still in print, still cited, and still taught.
-
It is not extremist — it is mainstream in Shafi’i jurisprudence, which is followed in:
-
East Africa
-
Egypt
-
Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia)
-
Parts of Syria and Yemen
-
π Even in “moderate” Muslim nations, many of these rulings remain in civil or family courts.
𧨠The Real Danger
When a Muslim says:
“Sharia isn’t what you think,”
Ask them:
“Do you reject the rulings in Reliance of the Traveller?”
They can’t say yes without:
-
Rejecting consensus (ijma)
-
Accusing Al-Azhar of error
-
Violating Quran 33:36 (no choice in matters Allah and His Messenger have decided)
π In Islamic law, denying a known ruling is apostasy.
✅ Final Word
Reliance of the Traveller is not a relic.
It is not extremist.
It is orthodox Islamic law — authorized by the highest Sunni institution on Earth.
Its rulings are:
-
Violent,
-
Regressive,
-
Unjust,
-
And still upheld.
This book is the legal blueprint of Sharia’s true face —
A system of control, conquest, and cruelty.
No comments:
Post a Comment